Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Kimi k2.6 good at Data & Analytics?

Kimi k2.6 ranks #22 of 110 for Data & Analytics — excellent. The top pick for this task is Minimax m3.

Best result with medium reasoning effort.

#22 / 110
Rank for this task
99.5
Score
$0.0157
Cost / run

Kimi k2.6 on each Data & Analytics sub-task

Spot the Misleading Stat 100.0/100 #2
Honest Communication 100.0/100 #1
SQL Reasoning 99.8/100 #49
Metric Calculation 98.2/100 #45

Real examples, graded

WinWeighted conversion rate (Cedar & Sage) 100/100

“The model correctly pools the numerators and denominators to calculate the overall conversion rate, arriving at the correct answer of 11.58%. It provides a clear step-by-step explanation and correctly notes why an unweighted average would be wrong, adding excellent business context.”

WinPercentage points vs percent (Northwind) 100/100

“The model correctly calculates and distinguishes between the absolute change (2 percentage points) and the relative change (20% relative gain). It also provides excellent business context by noting that the overall rate is still very low (nearly 9 in 10 pickups missing the window).”

WinBase rate of a duplicate-invoice flag (Ferrovia) 100/100

“The model correctly calculates the probability using both natural frequencies and Bayes' theorem, arriving at the exact correct answer of 20/69 or ~29%, and it shows all its work transparently while providing a clear, accurate business interpretation of the result.”

← Full Kimi k2.6 review All Data & Analytics rankings → Top pick: Minimax m3 →

Frequently asked

Is Kimi k2.6 good at Data & Analytics?

Kimi k2.6 ranks #22 of 110 models we tested for Data & Analytics, scoring excellent.

What is Kimi k2.6's strongest Data & Analytics skill?

Its best sub-task here is Spot the Misleading Stat.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s