Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

MoonshotAI · mid

Is Kimi K2.6 good?

Kimi K2.6 places top-3 in 1 of 6 task areas we tested. It's strongest at customer support and weakest at chef / home cooking. It's a mid-priced option ($4.07/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
6/22
Task areas tested
$4.07
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Strengths

Specificity Clarity Correctness Concision Constraint adherence Practicality

Weak spots

Timing accuracy Practical sequencing Food quality Explanation quality

How Kimi K2.6 ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Customer Support #3 of 113
Coding #5 of 115
AI Strategy #16 of 126
Data & Analytics #22 of 110
Content & Brand #29 of 124
Chef / Home Cooking #40 of 126

Straight from the judges

A real graded run from Kimi K2.6's strongest area and its weakest — the judge's unedited words.

WinCustomer Support 88/100

Payment failed

“The response is an excellent, production-ready template. It provides clear, actionable steps for resolving a payment failure while explicitly and proactively addressing security risks by warning the user not to send sensitive information via email. It is concise, well-organized, and maintains a professional tone.”

Weak spotChef / Home Cooking 40/100

Serrano ham scrambled eggs

“The recipe features excellent flavour combinations and handles the prompt's constraints perfectly. However, it contains a major food safety hazard by reusing an unwashed raw-egg bowl for a no-cook yogurt sauce. All scores are capped below 5.5 due to this unsafe advice.”

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Artificial Analysis indices

42.8
Intelligence
56
Coding
30.3
Agentic

Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1310)

3d 1355 svg 1234 dataviz 1303 gamedev 1316 website 1318 uicomponent 1319 codecategories 1327

Headline vs. real-world

Kimi K2.6 punches above its headline benchmarks — it ranks higher on our real-world tasks than its Intelligence Index would suggest.

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-07-03) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-07-03)

Like Kimi K2.6, but…

Similar

Cheaper

No clear alternative.

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is Kimi K2.6 any good?

Kimi K2.6 places top-3 in 1 of 6 task areas we benchmarked, with a median percentile of 84. It performs best at Customer Support (#3 of 113).

What is Kimi K2.6 best at?

Its strongest task areas are Customer Support (#3), Coding (#5), AI Strategy (#16).

What is Kimi K2.6 bad at?

Its weakest area is Chef / Home Cooking, where it ranks #40 of 126 (usable).

Is Kimi K2.6 good for coding?

Kimi K2.6 ranks #5 of 115 in our Coding task area (excellent), performing best at medium reasoning effort.

How much does Kimi K2.6 cost?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.66 per 1M input tokens and $3.41 per 1M output tokens ($4.07 blended).

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 6 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s