Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is kimi-k2.7-code-max good at Coding?

kimi-k2.7-code-max ranks #13 of 52 for Coding — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.

#13 / 52
Rank for this task
85.2
Score
$0.0255
Cost / run

kimi-k2.7-code-max on each Coding sub-task

Code Review & Security 100.0/100 #2
Secure Implementation 95.0/100 #19
Code Quality and Testing Test 87.2/100 #12
Refactoring 78.7/100 #32
API and Data Code Test 70.2/100 #17

Real examples, graded

WinRefactor legacy code with a safety net 100/100

“The response perfectly outlines a safe refactoring strategy for untested legacy code. It emphasizes characterization tests, small verifiable steps, preserving existing quirks/bugs to maintain backward compatibility, and parallel running. It meets all criteria for a strong answer without introducing any hallucinations or scope creep.”

← Full kimi-k2.7-code-max review All Coding rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.8-medium →

Frequently asked

Is kimi-k2.7-code-max good at Coding?

kimi-k2.7-code-max ranks #13 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring strong.

What is kimi-k2.7-code-max's strongest Coding skill?

Its best sub-task here is Code Review & Security.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s