Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

MoonshotAI · mid

Is Kimi K2.7 Code good?

Kimi K2.7 Code places top-3 in 1 of 21 task areas we tested. It's strongest at landing pages and weakest at structured output. It's a mid-priced option ($4.24/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
21/22
Task areas tested
$4.24
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code is a mid-tier model that we tested across 21 task areas. It performs best at Landing Pages, and is weakest at Customer Support.

Strengths

Clarity Concision Specificity Usefulness Structure Tone

Weak spots

Practical sequencing Timing accuracy Food quality Visual design Appropriate caveats Listening design

How Kimi K2.7 Code ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Landing Pages #3 of 56
Presentations & Decks #5 of 44
Research & Competitive Analysis #5 of 44
Investor & Pitch #6 of 50
Knowledge & Docs #16 of 94
Executive Assistant #9 of 50
Data & Analytics #16 of 69
Product & Project Management #11 of 44
Coding #13 of 52
Training & Education #18 of 44
Translation & Localization #18 of 44
Frontend & Landing Pages #41 of 93
AI Strategy #24 of 50
Sales #23 of 44
Summarization & Meeting Notes #24 of 44
Legal & HR #26 of 44
Content & Brand #30 of 50
Chef / Home Cooking #37 of 50
Creative & Comedy #36 of 44
Customer Support #37 of 43
Structured Output #38 of 43

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Artificial Analysis indices

41.9
Intelligence
60.8
Coding
29.6
Agentic

Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1301)

3d 1319 dataviz 1274 gamedev 1284 website 1319 uicomponent 1300 codecategories 1309

Headline vs. real-world

Kimi K2.7 Code's real-world results broadly track its headline Intelligence Index.

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like Kimi K2.7 Code, but…

Cheaper

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is Kimi K2.7 Code any good?

Kimi K2.7 Code places top-3 in 1 of 21 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Landing Pages.

What is Kimi K2.7 Code best at?

Its strongest task areas are Landing Pages, Presentations & Decks, Research & Competitive Analysis.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 59% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 21 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s