Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is qwen3.7-max-max good at Data & Analytics?

qwen3.7-max-max ranks #7 of 69 for Data & Analytics — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-low.

#7 / 69
Rank for this task
99.8
Score
$0.0172
Cost / run

qwen3.7-max-max on each Data & Analytics sub-task

Spot the Misleading Stat 100.0/100 #1
Honest Communication 100.0/100 #1
SQL Reasoning 99.8/100 #31
Metric Calculation 99.5/100 #10

Real examples, graded

WinWeighted conversion rate (Cedar & Sage) 100/100

“The model correctly pools the numerators and denominators to calculate the overall conversion rate of 11.58%. It shows its work clearly step-by-step and provides a helpful business context regarding why the blended rate is closer to Channel A's performance.”

WinPercentage points vs percent (Northwind) 100/100

“The model's final answer perfectly matches the correct answer. It provides both the absolute change in percentage points and the relative percentage change, clearly distinguishing between the two. It also adds excellent business context by highlighting the 88% failure rate and includes a note on mathematical precision.”

WinBase rate of a duplicate-invoice flag (Ferrovia) 100/100

“The model's final answer is 29.0% (20/69), which perfectly matches the correct answer. It shows its work clearly using both natural frequencies and Bayes' Theorem, and provides an excellent business takeaway explaining the base rate fallacy.”

← Full qwen3.7-max-max review All Data & Analytics rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.8-low →

Frequently asked

Is qwen3.7-max-max good at Data & Analytics?

qwen3.7-max-max ranks #7 of 69 models we tested for Data & Analytics, scoring excellent.

What is qwen3.7-max-max's strongest Data & Analytics skill?

Its best sub-task here is Spot the Misleading Stat.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s