Is qwen3.7-max-low good at Structured Output?
qwen3.7-max-low ranks #1 of 43 for Structured Output — excellent.
qwen3.7-max-low on each Structured Output sub-task
| Extraction | 100.0/100 | #1 |
| Missing & Ambiguous Data | 100.0/100 | #4 |
| Schema Adherence | 100.0/100 | #4 |
| Transformation | 99.7/100 | #9 |
| Noisy Structured Output Test | 98.8/100 | #2 |
Real examples, graded
WinNested policy extraction 100/100
“The model perfectly followed all instructions, returning strict JSON that adheres to the schema. It accurately extracted the policy clauses and intelligently cross-referenced sections to capture exceptions, demonstrating strong comprehension and faithfulness to the source text.”
WinAmbiguous value handling 96/100
“The model perfectly followed the instructions, outputting strict JSON, correctly identifying the explicitly unconfirmed email as null, and accurately extracting the other ambiguous fields while reflecting their uncertainty in the confidence object.”
Frequently asked
Is qwen3.7-max-low good at Structured Output?
qwen3.7-max-low ranks #1 of 43 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring excellent.
What is qwen3.7-max-low's strongest Structured Output skill?
Its best sub-task here is Extraction.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals