Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

29 results from 8 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
29
Shared sources
8
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 63.6%68.6%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.030.17
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.170.32
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.110.08
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4991,493
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,501
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,485
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,497
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,501
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,496
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.581.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 49.653.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.6%93.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 55.5%59.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.3%85.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 61.0%63.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 84.6%91.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 42.4%55.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 38.1%47.2%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 30.0%29.6%
Remote Labor IndexreportedProjects done to client standard% of projects 16.1%17.9%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.7%70.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%3.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.43
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.263.9
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,680.26$5,421.56

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.