Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 3. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 3.0× less per token ($6 vs $18 per 1M).

3
Task areas won
19
37
Avg percentile
76
0
Top-3 finishes
3
$6.0
Price / 1M tokens
$18.0
Anthropic
Provider
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 3.0× less per token ($6 vs $18 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Winner
Chef / Home Cooking #113 / 126
Needs editing
#20 / 126
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6
AI Strategy #91 / 126
Strong
#3 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Executive Assistant #73 / 112
Strong
#1 / 112
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Sales #80 / 110
Usable
#13 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding #94 / 115
Usable
#29 / 115
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Creative & Comedy #84 / 110 #19 / 110 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Investor & Pitch #63 / 66
Needs editing
#4 / 66
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Content & Brand #89 / 124
Usable
#31 / 124
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Landing Pages #61 / 72
Usable
#5 / 72
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Presentations & Decks #88 / 110
Strong
#35 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Data & Analytics #53 / 110
Excellent
#6 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Legal & HR #48 / 110
Excellent
#3 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Customer Support #99 / 113
Usable
#62 / 113
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Knowledge & Docs #71 / 110
Usable
#35 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Training & Education #36 / 110
Excellent
#9 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
RAG, Safety & Grounding #97 / 113
Strong
#73 / 113
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Research & Competitive Analysis #59 / 110
Usable
#35 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Frontend & Landing Pages #7 / 109
Usable
#23 / 109
Needs editing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Translation & Localization #27 / 110
Excellent
#13 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Product & Project Management #38 / 110
Strong
#48 / 110
Strong
Claude Haiku 4.5
Summarization & Meeting Notes #27 / 110
Excellent
#37 / 110
Excellent
Claude Haiku 4.5
Structured Output #109 / 113
Usable
#105 / 113
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher in 19 and Claude Haiku 4.5 in 3.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 3.0× less per token ($6 vs $18 per 1M).

What is Claude Haiku 4.5 better at?

Claude Haiku 4.5 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 4.6 at Frontend & Landing Pages, Product & Project Management, Summarization & Meeting Notes.

What is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better at?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 out-ranks Claude Haiku 4.5 at Chef / Home Cooking, AI Strategy, Executive Assistant.

Full Claude Haiku 4.5 review → Full Claude Sonnet 4.6 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s