Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 good at Translation & Localization?

Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks #30 of 44 for Translation & Localization — excellent. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max.

#30 / 44
Rank for this task
91.0
Score
$0.0152
Cost / run

Claude Haiku 4.5 on each Translation & Localization sub-task

Localization 98.0/100 #9
Register & Formality 97.0/100 #43
Business Translation 91.7/100 #41
Catch the Translation Error 74.0/100 #37

Real examples, graded

WinMarketing copy, natural not literal (EN→French) 100/100

“The model successfully translated the marketing copy into natural, idiomatic French, avoiding a literal translation while preserving the core message and playful tone.”

WinLocalize a receipt line (en-US → de-DE) 100/100

“The model followed all instructions perfectly, adapting the date, currency, and weight to German conventions exactly as specified in the correct answer. The translation is accurate, natural, and uses the correct formal register.”

WinFormal vs informal direction (EN→French, vous) 100/100

“The translation is perfectly accurate, highly fluent, and strictly adheres to the requested formal business register. The additional notes provided by the model correctly explain the linguistic choices made to ensure formality.”

← Full Claude Haiku 4.5 review All Translation & Localization rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max →

Frequently asked

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 good at Translation & Localization?

Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks #30 of 44 models we tested for Translation & Localization, scoring excellent.

What is Claude Haiku 4.5's strongest Translation & Localization skill?

Its best sub-task here is Localization.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s