Provider
Anthropic
Base model family
Model intelligence profile
Claude Haiku 4.5 benchmark results and model details
This family profile brings together 7 published benchmark records for Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5. Every result keeps its original benchmark, configuration, scale, and source; unrelated scores are never averaged.
Published benchmark evidence available · Business Skills V3 not yet authorized
Release date
Not yet verified
Exact-family source only
Published benchmarks
7
Native scales kept separate
Artificial Analysis
No exact match
As of 2026-07-16
Benchmark-level evidence
Published Claude Haiku 4.5 benchmark results
These are individual benchmarks, not collection rollups. Scores remain on their original scales, and agent or harness results stay labelled as system configurations.
Spring Prompt benchmark
BulletBench
330
60-second bullet Elo
Chess decision quality under a shared 60-second game clock and a 10+1 per-move clock.
Ladder Elo: anchored to a Stockfish skill ladder (random mover = 400). Internally consistent ordering, not FIDE-calibrated.
1 published configuration
Claude Haiku 4.5 (off)
330
- Bullet 95% interval
- 226–411
- 10+1 Elo
- 200
- Bullet games
- 96
- Bullet median move time
- 1.02s
- Average bullet game cost
- $0.0160
source-native benchmark
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
24*
A composite index of language-model performance across agentic work, coding, scientific reasoning, knowledge, and long-context reasoning.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
24*
- Status
- Estimated by source
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Intelligence Index v4.1 · 2026-07-30
Source record →
source-native benchmark
GPQA Diamond
65%
The most challenging subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, focused on scientific reasoning.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
65%
- Status
- Measured
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Independent evaluation · Public leaderboard snapshot · 2026-07-30
Source record →
source-native benchmark
Humanity's Last Exam
4%
A broad expert-level benchmark of difficult academic reasoning and knowledge questions.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
4%
- Status
- Measured
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Independent evaluation · Public leaderboard snapshot · 2026-07-30
Source record →
source-native benchmark
IFBench
42%
An instruction-following benchmark with diverse, verifiable out-of-domain output constraints.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
42%
- Status
- Measured
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Independent evaluation · Public leaderboard snapshot · 2026-07-30
Source record →
source-native benchmark
MMMU-Pro
55%
A multimodal academic reasoning benchmark designed to reduce shortcuts and guessing across many disciplines.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
55%
- Status
- Measured
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Independent evaluation · Public leaderboard snapshot · 2026-07-30
Source record →
source-native benchmark
τ²-Bench Telecom
32%
A legacy agentic tool-use benchmark for conversational work in a telecom environment.
1 published configuration
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
32%
- Status
- Measured
- Recorded
- 30 Jul 2026
Source: Artificial Analysis
Recorded 30 Jul 2026
Independent evaluation · Public leaderboard snapshot · 2026-07-30
Source record →
Independent operational reference
Artificial Analysis details
No exact, reviewed Artificial Analysis operational record is attached to this family. We do not inherit price, release, or throughput values from a nearby model name.
Early-user signal
Initial community opinions
No editor-reviewed community-opinions paragraph is active for this model. An active paragraph requires at least two retained Reddit discussions from the minimum 14-day launch window—implemented exactly as release date through day 14, end-exclusive—plus paraphrase-only review and a sealed publication artifact. Community reports stay separate from every benchmark score and model comparison.
Independent early-test signal
Early technical field tests
An editorial paraphrase of 2 launch-window field tests from 2 independent authors on X, including 2 reports with a described method or inspectable artifact. The window runs from 15 Oct 2025 up to 29 Oct 2025, and exact model identity was editor reviewed.
Launch-week reports consistently emphasized latency and interaction flow. Multi-day product testing found useful long-horizon reasoning and tool use, while a direct Haiku-versus-Sonnet comparison measured substantially faster responses. The evidence is coding-heavy and partly product-adjacent, so it supports a speed-and-value interpretation more strongly than broad claims about absolute capability.
These reports are selectively surfaced and are not a representative sample. They never affect benchmark scores, rankings, winners, or comparison outcomes.
Business Skills V3 · proposed
How Spring Prompt plans to test Claude Haiku 4.5
The setup below is proposed and may change until preflight and execution approval are complete. Existing benchmark evidence above does not authorize or stand in for a Business Skills V3 result.
- Proposed reasoning
- Provider-default reasoning
- Provider revision
- Exact provider revision will be resolved and frozen only after preflight and execution approval
- Tools and service
- No tools · Anthropic standard routing
- Planning configuration
- claude-haiku-4.5
- Generation controls
- Temperature 0 proposed
Future first-party coverage
15 proposed Business Skills V3 task areas
These links describe evaluation contracts, not published Claude Haiku 4.5 results.
Professional Knowledge Work & StrategyBusiness Workflow AutomationCustomer Support & Service ResolutionSales & MarketingLegal Document WorkFinance, Accounting & SpreadsheetsData Analysis & SQLResearch & Evidence SynthesisBusiness Writing & EmailDocument Comprehension & ExtractionSummarization & Grounded KnowledgeSoftware Engineering & CodingFrontend, UI & Web AppsTool Calling & Structured OutputPresentations, Charts & Visual Communication
Model comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 side by side
Editorially reviewed comparisons appear first. Every page matches only benchmark records with the same reviewed protocol key and does not manufacture an overall winner.
Publication safeguards
What must pass before a V3 result appears
- 1First-party task-local comparisons and eligible external evidence must both be present.
- 2Model and provider configuration identity must match the reviewed release exactly.
- 3Coverage, reliability, judge diagnostics, and sealed stability checks must pass.
- 4Uncertainty and missing evidence remain visible when results are published.
Stable family URL
Evidence can grow without changing the page
New reviewed benchmark snapshots, operational facts, community themes, and early field-test syntheses can be added here while the canonical model-family identity remains fixed.
More from Anthropic