Claude Opus 4.6
VS
GLM 5.2
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.2: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 14 of 22 task areas we tested; GLM 5.2 takes 8. GLM 5.2 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.76 vs $30 per 1M).
GLM 5.2 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.76 vs $30 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM 5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured Output |
#98
/ 113
Strong
|
#25
/ 113
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Customer Support |
#81
/ 113
Usable
|
#16
/ 113
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#59
/ 113
Excellent
|
#6
/ 113
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#12
/ 126
Strong
|
#59
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#66
/ 110
Usable
|
#21
/ 110
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Creative & Comedy | #10 / 110 | #46 / 110 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Sales |
#4
/ 110
Strong
|
#39
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Product & Project Management |
#45
/ 110
Strong
|
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#51
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#18
/ 109
Needs editing
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Data & Analytics |
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| AI Strategy |
#5
/ 126
Strong
|
#34
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#54
/ 110
Excellent
|
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Legal & HR |
#8
/ 110
Excellent
|
#36
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Training & Education |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#29
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Translation & Localization |
#2
/ 110
Excellent
|
#28
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Executive Assistant |
#18
/ 112
Strong
|
#43
/ 112
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#34
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#29
/ 110
Strong
|
#50
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#8
/ 66
Strong
|
#24
/ 66
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Coding |
#18
/ 115
Excellent
|
#23
/ 115
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Content & Brand |
#14
/ 124
Strong
|
#19
/ 124
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Landing Pages |
#23
/ 72
Strong
|
#26
/ 72
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than GLM 5.2?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher in 14 and GLM 5.2 in 8.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.76 vs $30 per 1M).
What is Claude Opus 4.6 better at?
Claude Opus 4.6 out-ranks GLM 5.2 at Chef / Home Cooking, Creative & Comedy, Sales.
What is GLM 5.2 better at?
GLM 5.2 out-ranks Claude Opus 4.6 at Structured Output, Customer Support, RAG, Safety & Grounding.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals