Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Google Gemini 3.5 Flash VS MiniMax MiniMax M3

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 14 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M3 takes 8. MiniMax M3 costs 7.0× less per token ($1.5 vs $10.5 per 1M).

14
Task areas won
8
71
Avg percentile
65
0
Top-3 finishes
4
$10.5
Price / 1M tokens
$1.5
Google
Provider
MiniMax

MiniMax M3 costs 7.0× less per token ($1.5 vs $10.5 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Gemini 3.5 Flash MiniMax M3 Winner
Customer Support #12 / 113
Strong
#83 / 113
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Summarization & Meeting Notes #17 / 110
Excellent
#79 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
RAG, Safety & Grounding #15 / 113
Excellent
#72 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Chef / Home Cooking #24 / 126
Usable
#74 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Investor & Pitch #56 / 66
Usable
#12 / 66
Strong
MiniMax M3
Legal & HR #73 / 110
Strong
#34 / 110
Excellent
MiniMax M3
Landing Pages #40 / 72
Strong
#2 / 72
Strong
MiniMax M3
Training & Education #7 / 110
Excellent
#42 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Data & Analytics #34 / 110
Excellent
#1 / 110
Excellent
MiniMax M3
Research & Competitive Analysis #65 / 110
Usable
#33 / 110
Strong
MiniMax M3
Sales #33 / 110
Strong
#2 / 110
Strong
MiniMax M3
Product & Project Management #33 / 110
Strong
#3 / 110
Excellent
MiniMax M3
Structured Output #35 / 113
Excellent
#65 / 113
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Creative & Comedy #27 / 110 #55 / 110 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Translation & Localization #30 / 110
Excellent
#55 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Knowledge & Docs #44 / 110
Strong
#67 / 110
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Coding #28 / 115
Strong
#49 / 115
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Executive Assistant #19 / 112
Strong
#39 / 112
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Content & Brand #46 / 124
Strong
#28 / 124
Strong
MiniMax M3
Frontend & Landing Pages #4 / 109
Usable
#20 / 109
Needs editing
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Presentations & Decks #17 / 110
Excellent
#29 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
AI Strategy #23 / 126
Strong
#27 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Same task, both models — judged

Both models answered the same test case; an independent judge graded each. Quotes are the judge's actual rationale.

Landing Pages

B2B analytics tool page structure (Landing Page Structure Test)
Gemini 3.5 Flash 32/100

“The model's response cuts off abruptly after the second section, failing to provide a complete landing page structure, missing the final CTA, and failing to fully address the constraints.”

MiniMax M3 90/100

“The response is expert-level and production-ready. It follows all constraints perfectly, uses a highly effective conversion logic (Pain -> Mechanism -> Outcome -> Proof -> Objection -> Ask), and provides exceptionally sharp, audience-specific copy points. It is difficult to improve.”

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than MiniMax M3?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher in 14 and MiniMax M3 in 8.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 costs 7.0× less per token ($1.5 vs $10.5 per 1M).

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash better at?

Gemini 3.5 Flash out-ranks MiniMax M3 at Customer Support, Summarization & Meeting Notes, RAG, Safety & Grounding.

What is MiniMax M3 better at?

MiniMax M3 out-ranks Gemini 3.5 Flash at Investor & Pitch, Legal & HR, Landing Pages.

Full Gemini 3.5 Flash review → Full MiniMax M3 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s