Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 VS Google Gemini 3.5 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 3. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 1.8× less per token ($6 vs $10.5 per 1M).

3
Task areas won
19
37
Avg percentile
71
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$6.0
Price / 1M tokens
$10.5
Anthropic
Provider
Google

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 1.8× less per token ($6 vs $10.5 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash Winner
Chef / Home Cooking #113 / 126
Needs editing
#24 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Customer Support #99 / 113
Usable
#12 / 113
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
RAG, Safety & Grounding #97 / 113
Strong
#15 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Structured Output #109 / 113
Usable
#35 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Presentations & Decks #88 / 110
Strong
#17 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
AI Strategy #91 / 126
Strong
#23 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Coding #94 / 115
Usable
#28 / 115
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Creative & Comedy #84 / 110 #27 / 110 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Executive Assistant #73 / 112
Strong
#19 / 112
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Sales #80 / 110
Usable
#33 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Content & Brand #89 / 124
Usable
#46 / 124
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Training & Education #36 / 110
Excellent
#7 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Knowledge & Docs #71 / 110
Usable
#44 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Legal & HR #48 / 110
Excellent
#73 / 110
Strong
Claude Haiku 4.5
Landing Pages #61 / 72
Usable
#40 / 72
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Data & Analytics #53 / 110
Excellent
#34 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Summarization & Meeting Notes #27 / 110
Excellent
#17 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Investor & Pitch #63 / 66
Needs editing
#56 / 66
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Research & Competitive Analysis #59 / 110
Usable
#65 / 110
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Product & Project Management #38 / 110
Strong
#33 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Frontend & Landing Pages #7 / 109
Usable
#4 / 109
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Translation & Localization #27 / 110
Excellent
#30 / 110
Excellent
Claude Haiku 4.5

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher in 19 and Claude Haiku 4.5 in 3.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 1.8× less per token ($6 vs $10.5 per 1M).

What is Claude Haiku 4.5 better at?

Claude Haiku 4.5 out-ranks Gemini 3.5 Flash at Legal & HR, Research & Competitive Analysis, Translation & Localization.

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash better at?

Gemini 3.5 Flash out-ranks Claude Haiku 4.5 at Chef / Home Cooking, Customer Support, RAG, Safety & Grounding.

Full Claude Haiku 4.5 review → Full Gemini 3.5 Flash review → Full model leaderboard → Anthropic vs Google — every model, lab against lab →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s