GLM 5.2
VS
GPT-5.4 Mini
GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.4 Mini: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
GLM 5.2 wins 16 of 22 task areas we tested; GPT-5.4 Mini takes 6. GLM 5.2 costs 1.4× less per token ($3.76 vs $5.25 per 1M).
GLM 5.2 costs 1.4× less per token ($3.76 vs $5.25 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content & Brand |
#19
/ 124
Strong
|
#84
/ 124
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Training & Education |
#29
/ 110
Excellent
|
#79
/ 110
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Executive Assistant |
#43
/ 112
Strong
|
#87
/ 112
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#50
/ 110
Usable
|
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#6
/ 113
Excellent
|
#42
/ 113
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#24
/ 66
Strong
|
#52
/ 66
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#59
/ 126
Usable
|
#83
/ 126
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Data & Analytics |
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
#65
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Structured Output |
#25
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#18
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#38
/ 109
Needs editing
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Landing Pages |
#26
/ 72
Strong
|
#45
/ 72
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#21
/ 110
Strong
|
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| AI Strategy |
#34
/ 126
Strong
|
#48
/ 126
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Creative & Comedy | #46 / 110 | #56 / 110 | GLM 5.2 |
| Legal & HR |
#36
/ 110
Excellent
|
#26
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
#19
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Product & Project Management |
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
#19
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Translation & Localization |
#28
/ 110
Excellent
|
#21
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Customer Support |
#16
/ 113
Strong
|
#21
/ 113
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Coding |
#23
/ 115
Strong
|
#24
/ 115
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Sales |
#39
/ 110
Usable
|
#40
/ 110
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is GLM 5.2 better than GPT-5.4 Mini?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, GLM 5.2 ranks higher in 16 and GPT-5.4 Mini in 6.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.4 Mini?
GLM 5.2 costs 1.4× less per token ($3.76 vs $5.25 per 1M).
What is GLM 5.2 better at?
GLM 5.2 out-ranks GPT-5.4 Mini at Content & Brand, Training & Education, Executive Assistant.
What is GPT-5.4 Mini better at?
GPT-5.4 Mini out-ranks GLM 5.2 at Research & Competitive Analysis, Structured Output, Knowledge & Docs.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals