Compare / Gemini 4 Argon vs Inkling Small

Gemini 4 Argon vs Inkling Small

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 21 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GoogleGemini 4 Argon Released 13 Oct 2026 · $2.00 in · $10.00 out
Thinking MachinesInkling Small Released 15 Jul 2026 · $0.45 in · $1.20 out
Gemini 4 Argon wins 171 too close to callInkling Small wins 3

Of the 21 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 14 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-14-7d7cf32c3f6d).

Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small? The short answer

Pick Gemini 4 Argon: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 52.6 against 25.7) and costs less.

  • Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper to run: $0.004 against $0.007 per game of bullet chess on BulletBench (2.1 times less).
  • Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 52.6 against 25.7.
  • Gemini 4 Argon is newer: released 13 Oct 2026, against 15 Jul 2026 for Inkling Small.
  • On our own benchmarks, on the results both models have: Inkling Small does better for speed under pressure.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Gemini 4 Argon does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

52.6
Intelligence Index
25.7
$4.00
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$0.64
1,048,576
Context window, tokens
524,288

Every fact side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonInkling Small
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $10.00 out$0.45 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$4.00$0.64
Cheapest host, blended––
Cost per game of bullet chess (BulletBench)$0.004$0.007
Intelligence Index52.625.7
Spring Prompt overall75–
Output speed, tokens a second–186
Context window1,048,576 tokens524,288 tokens
Released13 Oct 2026 (newer)15 Jul 2026
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live 7 of 22 not measured
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is 13 of 21 not measured
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled 5 of 10 not measured
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending 8 of 21 not measured
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 3 of 166 73 of 166
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 3 of 200 63 of 200
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 1 of 189 104 of 189
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 1 of 153 128 of 153
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) 20 of 25 6 of 25

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureGemini 4 ArgonInkling Small
BulletBench measured by Spring Prompt · 3 results
Cost per game · Bullet 60sUS dollars, lower is better 10 · 16 of 30 measured $0.0036 $0.0075no reasoning
Ladder Elo · Bullet 60sladder Elo, higher is better 26 · 11 of 30 measured 147 529no reasoning
Games lost on time · Bullet 60s% of games, lower is better 28 · 1 of 30 measured 87.5% 0.0%no reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 1 · 131 of 387 measured 1,525high reasoning 1,405
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 1 · 104 of 163 measured 1,511high reasoning 1,426
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 1 · 125 of 380 measured 1,522high reasoning 1,409
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 5 · 71 of 244 measured 52.6high reasoning 25.7
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 3 · 68 of 243 measured 57.1%high reasoning 33.3%
Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 4 · 53 of 113 measured 57.1%high reasoning 1.0%
Show all 21 results (12 more)
MeasureGemini 4 ArgonInkling Small
BulletBench measured by Spring Prompt · 2 results
Invalid moves · Bullet 60s% of moves, lower is better 1 · 30 of 30 measured 0.0% 7.2%no reasoning
Median move time · Bullet 60smilliseconds, lower is better 28 · 7 of 30 measured 2.9 s 0.6 sno reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 8 results
Confirmed task success · AgentIPS effect estimate, higher is better 3 · 46 of 48 measured 0.15high reasoning, arena agent -0.20arena agent
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 1 · 192 of 385 measured 1,519high reasoning 1,311
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 7 · 106 of 338 measured 1,539high reasoning 1,445
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 1 · 134 of 387 measured 1,528high reasoning 1,394
Praise over complaint · AgentIPS effect estimate, higher is better 4 · 46 of 48 measured 0.28high reasoning, arena agent -0.22arena agent
Steerability · AgentIPS effect estimate, higher is better 1 · 48 of 48 measured 0.13high reasoning, arena agent -0.14arena agent
Tool grounding · AgentIPS effect estimate, higher is better 29 · 40 of 48 measured 0.00high reasoning, arena agent -0.00arena agent
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 1 · 175 of 386 measured 1,522high reasoning 1,342
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 2 results
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 44 · 77 of 234 measured 79.7%high reasoning 75.7%
SciCode% of problems, higher is better 3 · 51 of 114 measured 61.8%high reasoning 49.7%

Quick answers

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Inkling Small?

Pick Gemini 4 Argon: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 52.6 against 25.7) and costs less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper to run: $0.004 against $0.007 per game of bullet chess on BulletBench (2.1 times less).

Which is better for agents and tool use, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon ranks 3 of 166 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 73 for Inkling Small.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon ranks 3 of 200 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 63 for Inkling Small.

Which is better for writing, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon ranks 1 of 189 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 104 for Inkling Small.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon ranks 1 of 153 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 128 for Inkling Small.

Which is better for speed under pressure, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small ranks 6 of 25 models on sale for good decisions against a real clock (fast chess), against 20 for Gemini 4 Argon.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Inkling Small?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens, against 524,288 for Inkling Small.

Run Gemini 4 Argon and Inkling Small on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.