Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is deepseek-v4-pro-high good at Chef / Home Cooking?

deepseek-v4-pro-high ranks #31 of 120 for Chef / Home Cooking — usable. The top pick for this task is gpt-5.5-pro-max.

#31 / 120
Rank for this task
78.4
Score
$0.0212
Cost / run

deepseek-v4-pro-high on each Chef / Home Cooking sub-task

Substitution Test 87.3/100 #26
Dinner Rescue Test 83.7/100 #39
Practical Recipe Test 82.7/100 #28
Meal Timing Test 60.0/100 #36

Real examples, graded

WinCurry without coconut milk 100/100

“The candidate perfectly follows all instructions, provides accurate quantities for two, clearly explains the culinary tradeoffs without sugar-coating, and offers a highly practical and well-structured recipe.”

← Full deepseek-v4-pro-high review All Chef / Home Cooking rankings → Top pick: gpt-5.5-pro-max →

Frequently asked

Is deepseek-v4-pro-high good at Chef / Home Cooking?

deepseek-v4-pro-high ranks #31 of 120 models we tested for Chef / Home Cooking, scoring usable.

What is deepseek-v4-pro-high's strongest Chef / Home Cooking skill?

Its best sub-task here is Substitution Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s