Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

OpenAI · frontier

Is GPT-5.5 Pro good?

GPT-5.5 Pro has been tested across 6 task areas. It's strongest at content & brand and weakest at ai strategy. It's a top-tier (premium) option ($210/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
6/22
Task areas tested
$210.0
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 Pro is a frontier-tier model that we tested across 6 task areas. It performs best at Content & Brand, and is weakest at AI Strategy.

Strengths

Specificity Concision Structure Usefulness Tone Risk handling

Weak spots

Practicality Missing elements Metric quality Tact Source of truth quality Alternative path quality

How GPT-5.5 Pro ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Content & Brand #17 of 50
Chef / Home Cooking #27 of 50
Landing Pages #33 of 56
Investor & Pitch #31 of 50
Executive Assistant #35 of 50
AI Strategy #45 of 50

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Headline vs. real-world

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like GPT-5.5 Pro, but…

Similar

Cheaper

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is GPT-5.5 Pro any good?

GPT-5.5 Pro places top-3 in 0 of 6 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Content & Brand.

What is GPT-5.5 Pro best at?

Its strongest task areas are Content & Brand, Chef / Home Cooking, Landing Pages.

Is there a cheaper alternative to GPT-5.5 Pro?

DeepSeek V3.2 is 100% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 6 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s