Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite good at Structured Output?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks #14 of 43 for Structured Output — excellent. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max-low.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite on each Structured Output sub-task
| Missing & Ambiguous Data | 100.0/100 | #1 |
| Schema Adherence | 100.0/100 | #1 |
| Extraction | 97.1/100 | #7 |
| Transformation | 97.1/100 | #14 |
| Noisy Structured Output Test | 83.0/100 | #27 |
Real examples, graded
WinKey order requirement 100/100
“The model perfectly followed all instructions, extracting the correct values and formatting them in a strict JSON object with the exact key order requested, without any wrapper text.”
WinSupport ticket to schema 100/100
“The model perfectly followed the schema, extracted the correct values, used null for the assignee, and provided only the raw JSON without any wrapper text.”
WinEvent details to typed schema 100/100
“The model perfectly followed all instructions, extracting the correct values, adhering strictly to the schema, correctly using null for the missing date, and providing raw JSON without any wrapper text.”
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite good at Structured Output?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks #14 of 43 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring excellent.
What is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's strongest Structured Output skill?
Its best sub-task here is Missing & Ambiguous Data.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals