Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Grok 4.20 Beta good at Structured Output?

Grok 4.20 Beta ranks #18 of 43 for Structured Output — strong. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max-low.

#18 / 43
Rank for this task
89.8
Score
$0.0143
Cost / run

Grok 4.20 Beta on each Structured Output sub-task

Missing & Ambiguous Data 100.0/100 #15
Schema Adherence 96.3/100 #18
Transformation 94.3/100 #17
Extraction 81.9/100 #26
Noisy Structured Output Test 81.6/100 #29

Real examples, graded

WeakExtract contact fields 60/100

“The model accurately and faithfully extracted all the required fields from the input text. However, it wrapped the output in markdown fences, which violates the strict JSON requirement and causes the raw response to fail direct JSON parsing.”

← Full Grok 4.20 Beta review All Structured Output rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max-low →

Frequently asked

Is Grok 4.20 Beta good at Structured Output?

Grok 4.20 Beta ranks #18 of 43 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring strong.

What is Grok 4.20 Beta's strongest Structured Output skill?

Its best sub-task here is Missing & Ambiguous Data.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s