Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Grok 4.20 good at Translation & Localization?

Grok 4.20 ranks #41 of 44 for Translation & Localization — strong. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max.

#41 / 44
Rank for this task
87.1
Score
$0.0136
Cost / run

Grok 4.20 on each Translation & Localization sub-task

Register & Formality 100.0/100 #29
Business Translation 95.3/100 #37
Localization 77.5/100 #32
Catch the Translation Error 65.0/100 #44

Real examples, graded

WeakFind the errors (EN→Spanish translation) 30/100

“While the model successfully caught the critical false friend 'embarazada', it failed the task by missing the other two major planted errors: the broken placeholder and the unlocalized date/currency formats. Additionally, it over-edited the text by flagging grammatically correct and natural phrasing as errors.”

← Full Grok 4.20 review All Translation & Localization rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max →

Frequently asked

Is Grok 4.20 good at Translation & Localization?

Grok 4.20 ranks #41 of 44 models we tested for Translation & Localization, scoring strong.

What is Grok 4.20's strongest Translation & Localization skill?

Its best sub-task here is Register & Formality.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s