Grok 4.7: On-time delivery: what is going wrong and what to fund
For the board and the company's three main investors. The decision it supports: whether to fund 40 more drivers or a trunk re-plan with 10 drivers.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,242
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
67%
Why it is not presentable
A slide the judges rated as needing work
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe lower panel is text-heavy, giving detailed depot caveats substantial visual space.The three KPI cards have large empty areas below their text, so the boxes look oversized.
Slide 3Needs workThe legend overlaps the Leeds bars, leaving the black 'Week 29' label partly against a navy bar and difficult to read.The legend sits on top of the Leeds bars. Its black 'Week 29' and 'Week 36' text is unreadable against the navy bar.
Slide 4PolishedAll bars are the same navy. The late-trunking bar is not highlighted, although its callout card is gold.
Slide 5AcceptableThe title introduces a comparison rather than stating its main takeaway.The title is a topic label rather than a takeaway, such as 'the re-plan costs a quarter of the annual spend'.
