Benchmarks / DeckBench / Kestrel Logistics

Measured by Spring Prompt

GPT-6 Astra: On-time delivery: what is going wrong and what to fund

For the board and the company's three main investors. The decision it supports: whether to fund 40 more drivers or a trunk re-plan with 10 drivers.

Verdict
Presentable
Deck rating
1,489
Slides
5 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
90%
  1. Slide 1 of GPT-6 Astra's deck
    Slide 1Polished
  2. Slide 2 of GPT-6 Astra's deck
    Slide 2Polished The contract-floor reference line carries a marker at every week; a plain line would be cleaner.
  3. Slide 3 of GPT-6 Astra's deck
    Slide 3Polished
  4. Slide 4 of GPT-6 Astra's deck
    Slide 4Acceptable The lower half is text-heavy: two explanatory paragraphs plus a full-width caveat dilute the funding comparison.There is a large empty band between the table and the two-column comparison, while the bottom grey note sits tight under the columns.
  5. Slide 5 of GPT-6 Astra's deck
    Slide 5Polished The REVIEW label is jammed directly under the CHANGE body text with almost no spacing, while CHANGE has generous space above it. The vertical rhythm is inconsistent and cramped.