Kimi K3: On-time delivery: what is going wrong and what to fund
For the board and the company's three main investors. The decision it supports: whether to fund 40 more drivers or a trunk re-plan with 10 drivers.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,255
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
79%
Why it is not presentable
Made a material claim the analysis does not support
In detail
Slide 2: “The rest of the network is holding.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 2: “The decline is concentrated in two depots; the rest of the network is holding.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished
Slide 3AcceptableSeveral depot lines use similar grey tones, making them harder to distinguish and increasing reliance on the legend.Leeds' week-34 spike is the most dramatic shape on the chart and pulls the eye away from the Doncaster/Stoke decline the title is about
Slide 4PolishedAll bars are the same dark colour; the late-trunking bar the title is about is not highlighted
Slide 5AcceptableThe cost table, option cards and closing sentence repeat the comparison, making the slide more text-heavy than necessary.Large empty gap between the table and the option cards
Slide 6Polished
Slide 7AcceptableThe approval requests are presented as an undifferentiated bullet list; the funding amounts and primary decision could have stronger visual emphasis.Large empty space below the bullet list on the left
