DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: On-time delivery: what is going wrong and what to fund
For the board and the company's three main investors. The decision it supports: whether to fund 40 more drivers or a trunk re-plan with 10 drivers.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
615
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
17%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
Made a material claim the analysis does not support
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 3: “Late trunking accounts for 38% — more than driver shortage and first-attempt failures combined.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 3: text 4: #F2A541 on #FFFFFF is 2.1:1.
Slide 4: text 5: #F2A541 on #FFFFFF is 2.1:1.
Slide 6: text 3: #F2A541 on #FFFFFF is 2.1:1.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Needs workExtraneous 0.0% labels along the chart baseline clutter the depot comparison.Chart shows phantom 0.0% bars beside every depot, so each real bar sits off-centre from its category label
Slide 3Needs workThe black 38% label has very poor contrast against the navy chart segment.Missing-glyph boxes in 'first-attempt', 'worst-performing', '90.1%' and '88.9%'
Slide 4Needs workThe title names the topic rather than stating the preferred option or cost takeaway.Chart has phantom £0.0 bars, so the real bars are offset from the A and B labels
Slide 5Needs workBroken characters interrupt multiple bullet points, including 're-plan', 'driver-shortage' and 'depot-level'.Title text is jammed against the top edge of its orange box, with uneven padding, so it looks like it is spilling out
Slide 6Needs workA broken character appears in 'mid-evening' in the first next-step bullet.'mid-evening' renders a missing-glyph box
