Benchmarks / ROASBench

Measured by Spring Prompt

ROASBench

Given twelve months of paid-marketing decisions for a simulated brand, which models grow the business and which overspend?

Results dated
29 Sep 2026
Models
17
Unit
profit per £1 spent
Licence
Spring Prompt original
ROASBench: return on ad spend, profit per £1 spent, higher is better
#ModelReturn on ad spend
profit per £1 spent, higher is better
Overall score
score out of 100
Months over budget
months of 12
Cost of a run
US dollars
1 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
£0.70
52.00$0.42
2 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
£0.69
51.60$1.06
3 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
£0.67
56.60$1.23
4 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
£0.66
53.40$0.0142
5 GPT-6 SolOpenAI
£0.65
54.10$0.24
6 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
£0.65
51.40$0.16
7 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
£0.64
51.50$2.49
8 Kimi K3Moonshot AI
£0.50
44.10$1.01
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
£0.42
43.50$0.52
10 Muse Spark 1.3Meta
£0.29
34.10$0.18
11 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek
£0.26
28.20$0.20
12 Grok 4.7xAI
£0.23
36.60$0.42
13 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Alibaba
£0.09
25.42$0.73
14 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
£0.01
25.40$0.0390
15 GLM 5.3Z.ai
£0.01
24.80$0.13
16 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral
−£0.17
15.23$0.15
17 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
−£0.21
17.52$0.0298

Each model runs at its provider's default reasoning setting. Some providers think at length by default and others barely at all, so this is what you get without tuning.

What it measures

  • Budget allocation across channels, month by month
  • Reacting to last month's results
  • Staying within budget

What it does not measure

  • Real ad performance: the market is a deterministic simulation
  • Creative quality of the ad copy
  • Any brand other than one invented skincare company

Method

  • A deterministic simulator scores every plan, so runs are reproducible
  • Critical failures (overspend, broken plans) are reported per model
  • Scores are not comparable with the 2026 v1 results