Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5.5

15 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Claude Opus 5.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4041,499
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3701,521
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4661,556
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3851,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4001,509
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3771,520
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.757.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 15.9%61.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.0%84.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 41.4%66.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%59.6%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 40.4%72.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%2.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.310.43
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.470.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.