Compare / Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs Claude Opus 5.5
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs Claude Opus 5.5
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 11 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 11 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Anthropic, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5? The short answer
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 57.6 against 28.4). Pick Qwen3.6-Max-Preview if cost matters more: it costs 3.5 times less per token.
- Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is cheaper: $2.31 against $8.00 per million tokens, 3.5 times less.
- Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 57.6 against 28.4.
- Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 22 Sep 2026, against 20 Apr 2026 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Claude Opus 5.5 does better for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $1.03 in · $6.16 out | $4.00 in · $20.00 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $2.31 | $8.00 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $8.00 (Amazon Bedrock) |
| Cached input, per million | – | $0.20 cached input |
| Intelligence Index | 28.4 | 57.6 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | 85 |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 97 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Released | 20 Apr 2026 | 22 Sep 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
From our research
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 51 · 4 of 387 measured | 1,460 | 1,504high reasoning |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 51 · 2 of 163 measured | 1,453 | 1,507high reasoning |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 64 · 10 of 380 measured | 1,451 | 1,489high reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 57 · 1 of 243 measured | 28.4 | 57.6max reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 70 · 1 of 242 measured | 30.8% | 61.4%max reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 33 · 4 of 233 measured | 80.7% | 84.7%max reasoning |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result | ||
| Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 21 · 4 of 76 measured | 52.0% | 72.2%max reasoning |
Show all 11 results (4 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 50 · 2 of 385 measured | 1,437 | 1,516high reasoning |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 36 · 6 of 338 measured | 1,500 | 1,541high reasoning |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 56 · 2 of 387 measured | 1,450 | 1,517high reasoning |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 50 · 2 of 386 measured | 1,446 | 1,519high reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.6-Max-Preview better than Claude Opus 5.5?
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 57.6 against 28.4). Pick Qwen3.6-Max-Preview if cost matters more: it costs 3.5 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is cheaper: $2.31 against $8.00 per million tokens, 3.5 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks 2 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 81 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks 1 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 59 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks 4 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 41 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks 2 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 45 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.
Run Qwen3.6-Max-Preview and Claude Opus 5.5 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.