Compare / Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 5.5

Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 5.5

10 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
10
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 5.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.090.16
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.080.19
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.030.14
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.557.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 40.5%61.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%84.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 49.5%66.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.5%59.6%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 55.8%72.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.