Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.5

18 results from 6 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
6
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4931,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,459
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,472
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,469
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,483
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,467
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 53.429.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%86.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 59.1%30.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 85.3%77.3%
Remote Labor IndexreportedProjects done to client standard% of projects 17.9%3.8%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 70.8%45.7%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%3.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.970.4
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,421.56$4,967.06

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.