Compare / Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5

15 results from 6 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
6
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5.5
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 49.2%73.5%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5081,499
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4881,521
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5351,556
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5031,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5021,509
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,520
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 40.757.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.3%61.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.7%84.7%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 21.0%30.6%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 51.7%72.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 1.0%2.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.43
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 61.470.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.