Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.1
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.1
13 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,499 | 1,448 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,521 | 1,428 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,556 | 1,482 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,516 | 1,450 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,509 | 1,456 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,520 | 1,437 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 57.6 | 24.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 61.4% | 28.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 84.7% | 80.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 72.2% | 48.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 2.0% | 113.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 70.0 | 55.8 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.