Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

12 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.4 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,335
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,387
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,362
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 57.620.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 61.4%28.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 84.7%76.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 66.9%47.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 59.6%0.5%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 72.2%11.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.