Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5 Nano

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5 Nano

10 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
10
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,339
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,247
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,354
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,338
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,289
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 57.613.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 61.4%9.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 84.7%45.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 72.2%11.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.