Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs gpt-oss-120b

Claude Opus 5.5 vs gpt-oss-120b

15 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5gpt-oss-120b
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 73.5%4.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,277
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,352
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,309
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 57.611.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 61.4%19.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 84.7%52.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 66.9%34.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 59.6%0.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%107.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.038.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.