Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3

19 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
19
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 67.751.0
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 52.312.9
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 33.814.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $911,566$9,718
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $1.06$0.13
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 00
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 51.624.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.651.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.69$0.01
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.160.06
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.190.06
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.140.03
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,470

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.