Claude Fable 5
VS
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Fable 5 wins 18 of 22 task areas we tested; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 4. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 34.3× less per token ($1.75 vs $60 per 1M).
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 34.3× less per token ($1.75 vs $60 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal & HR |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#86
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Creative & Comedy | #1 / 110 | #85 / 110 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Executive Assistant |
#22
/ 112
Strong
|
#101
/ 112
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#3
/ 126
Strong
|
#70
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Sales |
#5
/ 110
Strong
|
#67
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
#80
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| AI Strategy |
#1
/ 126
Strong
|
#54
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Customer Support |
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
#54
/ 113
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
#56
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#58
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#10
/ 109
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Coding |
#11
/ 115
Excellent
|
#58
/ 115
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Product & Project Management |
#76
/ 110
Strong
|
#29
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Content & Brand |
#1
/ 124
Excellent
|
#43
/ 124
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Landing Pages |
#1
/ 72
Strong
|
#43
/ 72
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Data & Analytics |
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
#44
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#3
/ 66
Strong
|
#44
/ 66
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Structured Output |
#68
/ 113
Strong
|
#36
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#30
/ 113
Excellent
|
#58
/ 113
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Translation & Localization |
#18
/ 110
Excellent
|
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Training & Education |
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
#33
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#27
/ 110
Strong
|
#33
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher in 18 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 4.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 34.3× less per token ($1.75 vs $60 per 1M).
What is Claude Fable 5 better at?
Claude Fable 5 out-ranks Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite at Legal & HR, Creative & Comedy, Executive Assistant.
What is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better at?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite out-ranks Claude Fable 5 at Frontend & Landing Pages, Product & Project Management, Structured Output.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals