Claude Fable 5
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Fable 5 wins 13 of 22 task areas we tested; Qwen3.7 Max takes 9. Qwen3.7 Max costs 12.0× less per token ($5 vs $60 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 12.0× less per token ($5 vs $60 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product & Project Management |
#76
/ 110
Strong
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Structured Output |
#68
/ 113
Strong
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Legal & HR |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#3
/ 126
Strong
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#58
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#1
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#30
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#5
/ 110
Strong
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Translation & Localization |
#18
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#3
/ 66
Strong
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Executive Assistant |
#22
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Data & Analytics |
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Presentations & Decks |
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Content & Brand |
#1
/ 124
Excellent
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Landing Pages |
#1
/ 72
Strong
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Coding |
#11
/ 115
Excellent
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Creative & Comedy | #1 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#27
/ 110
Strong
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Fable 5 |
| Training & Education |
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher in 13 and Qwen3.7 Max in 9.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 12.0× less per token ($5 vs $60 per 1M).
What is Claude Fable 5 better at?
Claude Fable 5 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Research & Competitive Analysis, Legal & HR, Chef / Home Cooking.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Claude Fable 5 at Product & Project Management, Structured Output, Frontend & Landing Pages.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals