Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 VS MiniMax MiniMax M2.7

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 3. MiniMax M2.7 costs 6.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $6 per 1M).

19
Task areas won
3
37
Avg percentile
15
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$6.0
Price / 1M tokens
$0.9
Anthropic
Provider
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.7 costs 6.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $6 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Haiku 4.5 MiniMax M2.7 Winner
Frontend & Landing Pages #7 / 109
Usable
#89 / 109
Weak
Claude Haiku 4.5
Summarization & Meeting Notes #27 / 110
Excellent
#104 / 110
Strong
Claude Haiku 4.5
Structured Output #109 / 113
Usable
#33 / 113
Excellent
MiniMax M2.7
Training & Education #36 / 110
Excellent
#106 / 110
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Translation & Localization #27 / 110
Excellent
#82 / 110
Excellent
Claude Haiku 4.5
Data & Analytics #53 / 110
Excellent
#92 / 110
Excellent
Claude Haiku 4.5
Knowledge & Docs #71 / 110
Usable
#108 / 110
Weak
Claude Haiku 4.5
Research & Competitive Analysis #59 / 110
Usable
#96 / 110
Needs editing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Executive Assistant #73 / 112
Strong
#107 / 112
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Legal & HR #48 / 110
Excellent
#81 / 110
Strong
Claude Haiku 4.5
AI Strategy #91 / 126
Strong
#119 / 126
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Sales #80 / 110
Usable
#108 / 110
Weak
Claude Haiku 4.5
Product & Project Management #38 / 110
Strong
#64 / 110
Strong
Claude Haiku 4.5
Creative & Comedy #84 / 110 #108 / 110 Claude Haiku 4.5
Chef / Home Cooking #113 / 126
Needs editing
#124 / 126
Weak
Claude Haiku 4.5
Coding #94 / 115
Usable
#105 / 115
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Customer Support #99 / 113
Usable
#108 / 113
Needs editing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Content & Brand #89 / 124
Usable
#96 / 124
Usable
Claude Haiku 4.5
Landing Pages #61 / 72
Usable
#68 / 72
Needs editing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Presentations & Decks #88 / 110
Strong
#83 / 110
Strong
MiniMax M2.7
Investor & Pitch #63 / 66
Needs editing
#66 / 66
Weak
Claude Haiku 4.5
RAG, Safety & Grounding #97 / 113
Strong
#94 / 113
Strong
MiniMax M2.7

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than MiniMax M2.7?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks higher in 19 and MiniMax M2.7 in 3.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 costs 6.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $6 per 1M).

What is Claude Haiku 4.5 better at?

Claude Haiku 4.5 out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at Frontend & Landing Pages, Summarization & Meeting Notes, Training & Education.

What is MiniMax M2.7 better at?

MiniMax M2.7 out-ranks Claude Haiku 4.5 at Structured Output, Presentations & Decks, RAG, Safety & Grounding.

Full Claude Haiku 4.5 review → Full MiniMax M2.7 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s