Claude Opus 4.6
VS
Kimi K2.7 Code
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 13 of 22 task areas we tested; Kimi K2.7 Code takes 9. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 7.1× less per token ($4.24 vs $30 per 1M).
Kimi K2.7 Code costs 7.1× less per token ($4.24 vs $30 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Opus 4.6 | Kimi K2.7 Code | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Support |
#81
/ 113
Usable
|
#10
/ 113
Strong
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Structured Output |
#98
/ 113
Strong
|
#46
/ 113
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#66
/ 110
Usable
|
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Presentations & Decks |
#54
/ 110
Excellent
|
#5
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#12
/ 126
Strong
|
#58
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Translation & Localization |
#2
/ 110
Excellent
|
#48
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Sales |
#4
/ 110
Strong
|
#48
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| AI Strategy |
#5
/ 126
Strong
|
#44
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#59
/ 113
Excellent
|
#21
/ 113
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Training & Education |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Product & Project Management |
#45
/ 110
Strong
|
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Content & Brand |
#14
/ 124
Strong
|
#48
/ 124
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Creative & Comedy | #10 / 110 | #44 / 110 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Coding |
#18
/ 115
Excellent
|
#41
/ 115
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Data & Analytics |
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
#31
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#34
/ 110
Excellent
|
#47
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Executive Assistant |
#18
/ 112
Strong
|
#6
/ 112
Strong
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#29
/ 110
Strong
|
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Investor & Pitch |
#8
/ 66
Strong
|
#15
/ 66
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Landing Pages |
#23
/ 72
Strong
|
#17
/ 72
Strong
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Legal & HR |
#8
/ 110
Excellent
|
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#51
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#54
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher in 13 and Kimi K2.7 Code in 9.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code costs 7.1× less per token ($4.24 vs $30 per 1M).
What is Claude Opus 4.6 better at?
Claude Opus 4.6 out-ranks Kimi K2.7 Code at Chef / Home Cooking, Translation & Localization, Sales.
What is Kimi K2.7 Code better at?
Kimi K2.7 Code out-ranks Claude Opus 4.6 at Customer Support, Structured Output, Knowledge & Docs.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals