Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Sonnet 5 takes 3. Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

19
Task areas won
3
87
Avg percentile
60
7
Top-3 finishes
1
$30.0
Price / 1M tokens
$12.0
Anthropic
Provider
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Sonnet 5 Winner
Summarization & Meeting Notes #32 / 107
Excellent
#105 / 107
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
RAG, Safety & Grounding #11 / 110
Excellent
#77 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Creative & Comedy #11 / 107 #76 / 107 Claude Opus 4.8
Executive Assistant #7 / 109
Strong
#66 / 109
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Product & Project Management #2 / 107
Excellent
#59 / 107
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Content & Brand #15 / 124
Strong
#68 / 124
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Legal & HR #5 / 107
Excellent
#55 / 107
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Training & Education #2 / 107
Excellent
#49 / 107
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Customer Support #7 / 113
Strong
#52 / 113
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Frontend & Landing Pages #18 / 106
Needs editing
#54 / 106
Needs editing
Claude Opus 4.8
Chef / Home Cooking #8 / 126
Strong
#27 / 126
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Knowledge & Docs #2 / 107
Excellent
#18 / 107
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Sales #1 / 107
Strong
#15 / 107
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Data & Analytics #2 / 110
Excellent
#15 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Investor & Pitch #22 / 63
Strong
#34 / 63
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Presentations & Decks #30 / 107
Excellent
#20 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
Research & Competitive Analysis #5 / 107
Excellent
#15 / 107
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Structured Output #56 / 110
Excellent
#64 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Translation & Localization #34 / 107
Excellent
#40 / 107
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Landing Pages #28 / 69
Strong
#23 / 69
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Coding #3 / 115
Excellent
#6 / 115
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
AI Strategy #3 / 126
Strong
#1 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Claude Sonnet 5?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher in 19 and Claude Sonnet 5 in 3.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

What is Claude Opus 4.8 better at?

Claude Opus 4.8 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 5 at Summarization & Meeting Notes, RAG, Safety & Grounding, Creative & Comedy.

What is Claude Sonnet 5 better at?

Claude Sonnet 5 out-ranks Claude Opus 4.8 at Presentations & Decks, Landing Pages, AI Strategy.

Full Claude Opus 4.8 review → Full Claude Sonnet 5 review → Full model leaderboard →

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s