GLM 5.2
VS
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
GLM 5.2 wins 13 of 22 task areas we tested; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 takes 9. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 2.1× less per token ($1.82 vs $3.76 per 1M).
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 2.1× less per token ($1.82 vs $3.76 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GLM 5.2 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding |
#23
/ 115
Strong
|
#71
/ 115
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#21
/ 110
Strong
|
#51
/ 110
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Product & Project Management |
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
#40
/ 110
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Content & Brand |
#19
/ 124
Strong
|
#45
/ 124
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Creative & Comedy | #46 / 110 | #71 / 110 | GLM 5.2 |
| Legal & HR |
#36
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#50
/ 110
Usable
|
#73
/ 110
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Training & Education |
#29
/ 110
Excellent
|
#6
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#59
/ 126
Usable
|
#40
/ 126
Usable
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Executive Assistant |
#43
/ 112
Strong
|
#61
/ 112
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Translation & Localization |
#28
/ 110
Excellent
|
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Data & Analytics |
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
#26
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#18
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#3
/ 109
Usable
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
#40
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#24
/ 66
Strong
|
#36
/ 66
Usable
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Sales |
#39
/ 110
Usable
|
#27
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Landing Pages |
#26
/ 72
Strong
|
#36
/ 72
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| Structured Output |
#25
/ 113
Excellent
|
#18
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| AI Strategy |
#34
/ 126
Strong
|
#32
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Customer Support |
#16
/ 113
Strong
|
#18
/ 113
Strong
|
GLM 5.2 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#6
/ 113
Excellent
|
#7
/ 113
Excellent
|
GLM 5.2 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is GLM 5.2 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, GLM 5.2 ranks higher in 13 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 in 9.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 2.1× less per token ($1.82 vs $3.76 per 1M).
What is GLM 5.2 better at?
GLM 5.2 out-ranks Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 at Coding, Summarization & Meeting Notes, Knowledge & Docs.
What is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 better at?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 out-ranks GLM 5.2 at Legal & HR, Training & Education, Chef / Home Cooking.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals