GPT-5.4
VS
MiniMax M2.7
GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
GPT-5.4 wins 22 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 0. MiniMax M2.7 costs 19.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $17.5 per 1M).
MiniMax M2.7 costs 19.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $17.5 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GPT-5.4 | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & Docs |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#19
/ 126
Strong
|
#124
/ 126
Weak
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Creative & Comedy | #6 / 110 | #108 / 110 | GPT-5.4 |
| Coding |
#9
/ 115
Excellent
|
#105
/ 115
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Customer Support |
#13
/ 113
Strong
|
#108
/ 113
Needs editing
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#96
/ 110
Needs editing
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
#104
/ 110
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Content & Brand |
#7
/ 124
Strong
|
#96
/ 124
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#5
/ 109
Usable
|
#89
/ 109
Weak
|
GPT-5.4 |
| AI Strategy |
#37
/ 126
Strong
|
#119
/ 126
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Executive Assistant |
#25
/ 112
Strong
|
#107
/ 112
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#83
/ 110
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Sales |
#41
/ 110
Usable
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
GPT-5.4 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#29
/ 113
Excellent
|
#94
/ 113
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Translation & Localization |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#82
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Legal & HR |
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
#81
/ 110
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#7
/ 66
Strong
|
#66
/ 66
Weak
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Product & Project Management |
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
#64
/ 110
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Data & Analytics |
#42
/ 110
Excellent
|
#92
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Landing Pages |
#22
/ 72
Strong
|
#68
/ 72
Needs editing
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Training & Education |
#69
/ 110
Strong
|
#106
/ 110
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Structured Output |
#9
/ 113
Excellent
|
#33
/ 113
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Same task, both models — judged
Both models answered the same test case; an independent judge graded each. Quotes are the judge's actual rationale.
Content & Brand
AI transformation without saying anything (Empty Insight Test)
“The response perfectly executes the prompt with high-quality, production-ready prose. It meets all constraints, provides concrete and realistic examples, and avoids generic filler. It is difficult to improve upon for a short newsletter section.”
“The model's response is severely truncated, failing to meet the word count constraint and missing almost all required elements.”
Frequently asked
Is GPT-5.4 better than MiniMax M2.7?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, GPT-5.4 ranks higher in 22 and MiniMax M2.7 in 0.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or MiniMax M2.7?
MiniMax M2.7 costs 19.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $17.5 per 1M).
What is GPT-5.4 better at?
GPT-5.4 out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at Knowledge & Docs, Chef / Home Cooking, Creative & Comedy.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals