Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5 VS MiniMax MiniMax M2.7

Kimi K2.5 vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Kimi K2.5 wins 20 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 2. MiniMax M2.7 costs 2.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $2.4 per 1M).

20
Task areas won
2
68
Avg percentile
15
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$2.4
Price / 1M tokens
$0.9
MoonshotAI
Provider
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.7 costs 2.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $2.4 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Kimi K2.5 MiniMax M2.7 Winner
AI Strategy #28 / 126
Strong
#119 / 126
Usable
Kimi K2.5
Sales #19 / 110
Strong
#108 / 110
Weak
Kimi K2.5
Executive Assistant #23 / 112
Strong
#107 / 112
Usable
Kimi K2.5
Training & Education #22 / 110
Excellent
#106 / 110
Usable
Kimi K2.5
RAG, Safety & Grounding #12 / 113
Excellent
#94 / 113
Strong
Kimi K2.5
Chef / Home Cooking #44 / 126
Usable
#124 / 126
Weak
Kimi K2.5
Data & Analytics #19 / 110
Excellent
#92 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.5
Presentations & Decks #12 / 110
Excellent
#83 / 110
Strong
Kimi K2.5
Coding #38 / 115
Strong
#105 / 115
Usable
Kimi K2.5
Creative & Comedy #42 / 110 #108 / 110 Kimi K2.5
Research & Competitive Analysis #31 / 110
Strong
#96 / 110
Needs editing
Kimi K2.5
Content & Brand #33 / 124
Strong
#96 / 124
Usable
Kimi K2.5
Frontend & Landing Pages #26 / 109
Needs editing
#89 / 109
Weak
Kimi K2.5
Customer Support #50 / 113
Strong
#108 / 113
Needs editing
Kimi K2.5
Legal & HR #31 / 110
Excellent
#81 / 110
Strong
Kimi K2.5
Knowledge & Docs #59 / 110
Usable
#108 / 110
Weak
Kimi K2.5
Landing Pages #20 / 72
Strong
#68 / 72
Needs editing
Kimi K2.5
Translation & Localization #34 / 110
Excellent
#82 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.5
Investor & Pitch #37 / 66
Usable
#66 / 66
Weak
Kimi K2.5
Summarization & Meeting Notes #92 / 110
Excellent
#104 / 110
Strong
Kimi K2.5
Structured Output #41 / 113
Excellent
#33 / 113
Excellent
MiniMax M2.7
Product & Project Management #66 / 110
Strong
#64 / 110
Strong
MiniMax M2.7

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Same task, both models — judged

Both models answered the same test case; an independent judge graded each. Quotes are the judge's actual rationale.

Executive Assistant

Internal conflict meeting (Useful in Five Minutes)
Kimi K2.5 92/100

“The response is expert-level, highly actionable, and perfectly formatted for a quick 5-minute prep. It anticipates the exact dynamics of a Sales vs. Engineering conflict, provides excellent de-escalation scripts, and leaves clear placeholders for unknown details.”

MiniMax M2.7 51/100

“The response is well-formatted, concise, and includes all requested sections. However, it explicitly violates a failure mode by inventing specific facts (e.g., verbal sign-offs, 'feature X', product manager involvement) rather than working within the provided known facts or using clear placeholders. This poor uncertainty handling significantly reduces the briefing's reliability for a real meeting.”

Frequently asked

Is Kimi K2.5 better than MiniMax M2.7?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Kimi K2.5 ranks higher in 20 and MiniMax M2.7 in 2.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 costs 2.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $2.4 per 1M).

What is Kimi K2.5 better at?

Kimi K2.5 out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at AI Strategy, Sales, Executive Assistant.

What is MiniMax M2.7 better at?

MiniMax M2.7 out-ranks Kimi K2.5 at Structured Output, Product & Project Management.

Full Kimi K2.5 review → Full MiniMax M2.7 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s