Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic · 9 models tested

Which Anthropic model should you use?

Anthropic's strongest model is Claude Opus 4.8 (avg percentile 87, top-3 in 7 of 22 task areas). On a budget, Claude Sonnet 4.6 stays close at $18/1M.

The Anthropic lineup, ranked

Model Overall Code & dataWriting & commsBusiness & strategyCreative & visual AA Intel† Top-3s Price / 1M
Claude Opus 4.8 Best overall
22 task areas
87 84 87 90 82 56 7 $30.0
Claude Opus 4.7
6 task areas
84 90 91 69 54 1 $30.0
Claude Opus 4.5
22 task areas
79 64 81 78 92 3 $30.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Best value
22 task areas
76 57 72 85 83 47 4 $18.0
Claude Opus 4.6
22 task areas
73 59 71 82 73 2 $30.0
Claude Fable 5
22 task areas
68 40 73 73 81 60 6 $60.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5
22 task areas
61 55 75 53 62 36 1 $18.0
Claude Sonnet 5
22 task areas
60 64 56 63 56 53 1 $12.0
Claude Haiku 4.5
22 task areas
39 29 44 42 34 30 0 $6.0

Area figures are mean percentile ranks; 85+ 70–84 55–69 40–54 <40 · ★ = the lineup's best in that area. †AA Intel = Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, third-party reference only.

Best Anthropic model, task by task

The lineup's strongest model in each task area — and where it lands against every model we test, not just Anthropic's. #1 means it beats every rival lab too.

Task area Their best here Rank vs. everyone Rating
AI Strategy Claude Sonnet 5 #1 / 126 Strong
Creative & Comedy Claude Fable 5 #1 / 107 Elo
Executive Assistant Claude Sonnet 4.6 #1 / 112 Strong
Investor & Pitch Claude Fable 5 #1 / 63 Strong
Legal & HR Claude Fable 5 #1 / 107 Excellent
Sales Claude Opus 4.8 #1 / 107 Strong
Summarization & Meeting Notes Claude Opus 4.5 #1 / 107 Excellent
Training & Education Claude Opus 4.6 #1 / 107 Excellent
Data & Analytics Claude Opus 4.8 #2 / 110 Excellent
Frontend & Landing Pages Claude Opus 4.5 #2 / 106 Usable
Knowledge & Docs Claude Opus 4.8 #2 / 107 Excellent
Product & Project Management Claude Opus 4.8 #2 / 107 Excellent
Translation & Localization Claude Opus 4.6 #2 / 107 Excellent
Chef / Home Cooking Claude Fable 5 #3 / 126 Strong
Coding Claude Opus 4.8 #3 / 115 Excellent
Research & Competitive Analysis Claude Fable 5 #3 / 107 Excellent
Customer Support Claude Opus 4.8 #7 / 113 Strong
Content & Brand Claude Fable 5 #8 / 124 Excellent
Landing Pages Claude Sonnet 4.5 #9 / 69 Usable
RAG, Safety & Grounding Claude Opus 4.8 #11 / 110 Excellent
Presentations & Decks Claude Fable 5 #18 / 107 Excellent
Structured Output Claude Opus 4.8 #56 / 110 Excellent

Where another lab clearly wins

Honesty corner: the task areas where even Anthropic's best model ranks furthest from the top. See who actually leads there.

Frequently asked

What is the best Anthropic model?

Claude Opus 4.8 — the highest average percentile (87) across the task areas we benchmarked, with 7 top-3 finishes.

What is the best cheap Anthropic model?

Claude Sonnet 4.6: within 10 percentile points of Claude Opus 4.8 at $18 per 1M tokens.

Where does Anthropic lead every other lab?

A Anthropic model holds the outright #1 spot in 8 task areas: AI Strategy, Creative & Comedy, Executive Assistant, Investor & Pitch, Legal & HR, Sales, Summarization & Meeting Notes, Training & Education.

Every model, every lab — full leaderboard → Best model by task →

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s