Qwen · 3 models tested
Which Qwen model should you use?
Qwen's strongest model is Qwen3.7 Max (avg percentile 85, top-3 in 5 of 22 task areas).
The Qwen lineup, ranked
| Model | Overall | Code & data | Writing & comms | Business & strategy | Creative & visual | AA Intel† | Top-3s | Price / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Qwen3.7 Max
Best overall
22 task areas
|
85 | 94★ | 89★ | 76★ | 87★ | 46 | 5 | $5.0 |
|
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
22 task areas
|
68 | 76 | 72 | 66 | 61 | — | 1 | $1.82 |
|
Qwen3 Coder Flash
1 task areas
|
3 | — | — | — | 3 | — | 0 | $1.17 |
Area figures are mean percentile ranks; 85+ 70–84 55–69 40–54 <40 · ★ = the lineup's best in that area. †AA Intel = Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, third-party reference only.
Best Qwen model, task by task
The lineup's strongest model in each task area — and where it lands against every model we test, not just Qwen's. #1 means it beats every rival lab too.
Where another lab clearly wins
Honesty corner: the task areas where even Qwen's best model ranks furthest from the top. See who actually leads there.
Frequently asked
What is the best Qwen model?
Qwen3.7 Max — the highest average percentile (85) across the task areas we benchmarked, with 5 top-3 finishes.
Where does Qwen lead every other lab?
A Qwen model holds the outright #1 spot in 4 task areas: Content & Brand, Landing Pages, RAG, Safety & Grounding, Translation & Localization.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals