Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K2.6

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K2.6

16 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,461
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,441
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 57.627.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 61.4%37.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 84.7%81.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 66.9%51.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 59.6%0.5%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 30.6%12.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 72.2%34.9%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%18.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.064.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.