Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

55 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
55
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.18$0.28
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 62.5%37.5%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.0%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 557839
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 7.5 s5.6 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.6%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 96.6%98.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 1.8%5.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 3.6%70.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 0.0%66.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 4.360.18
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 95.2%5.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 15.5%20.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%1.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 97.2%98.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0400$0.0371
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 96.6%98.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 92.2%94.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 0.5%1.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 3.0%6.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 58.3%74.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 39.3%71.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 0.830.14
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 30.9%4.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 15.5%17.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%1.8%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 67.768.6
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 52.357.5
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 33.844.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated £ 911,566599,139
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $1.06$1.23
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 00
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 51.656.6
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.654.9
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per £1 spent £0.69£0.67
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.160.13
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.190.34
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.14-0.01
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4991,483
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5211,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5561,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5161,473
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5091,478
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5201,469
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%0.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.068.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.