Claude Opus 5.5: Manchester store investment review
For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Presentable
Deck rating
1,356
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
71%
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2PolishedThe bottom half of all three cards is empty, so the cards look oversized for their content
Slide 3AcceptableAll bars have equal visual emphasis; highlighting the adjusted pop-up result and business-case assumption would make the key comparison faster to grasp.All bars are the same colour; the adjusted pop-up bar and the business-case bar the argument depends on are not highlighted
Slide 4AcceptableThe 36-month threshold is stated above the chart but not marked on it; a reference line would make the pass/fail comparison immediate.The 36-month board rule is only stated in the chart title, with no reference line drawn on the chart
Slide 5AcceptableThe EBITDA axis uses evenly spaced ticks with rounded labels that imply uneven intervals (0%, 2%, 5%, 8%, etc.); cleaner tick increments would improve readability.The EBITDA margin axis has unevenly rounded ticks (0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18%), which is confusing and misleading
Slide 6AcceptableThe oversized text panels leave substantial unused space below the copy.The lower half of both cards is empty, making the cards oversized for their text