Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 VS Google Gemini 3.5 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 13 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 9. Gemini 3.5 Flash costs 1.7× less per token ($10.5 vs $18 per 1M).

9
Task areas won
13
58
Avg percentile
71
1
Top-3 finishes
0
$18.0
Price / 1M tokens
$10.5
Anthropic
Provider
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs 1.7× less per token ($10.5 vs $18 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Sonnet 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash Winner
Chef / Home Cooking #80 / 126
Usable
#24 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Structured Output #80 / 113
Strong
#35 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
AI Strategy #67 / 126
Strong
#23 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Training & Education #51 / 110
Excellent
#7 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Creative & Comedy #66 / 110 #27 / 110 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Product & Project Management #71 / 110
Strong
#33 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Coding #62 / 115
Strong
#28 / 115
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Customer Support #43 / 113
Strong
#12 / 113
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Content & Brand #74 / 124
Usable
#46 / 124
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Presentations & Decks #43 / 110
Excellent
#17 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Research & Competitive Analysis #39 / 110
Strong
#65 / 110
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Frontend & Landing Pages #29 / 109
Needs editing
#4 / 109
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
RAG, Safety & Grounding #39 / 113
Excellent
#15 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Sales #10 / 110
Strong
#33 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Knowledge & Docs #28 / 110
Strong
#44 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Summarization & Meeting Notes #2 / 110
Excellent
#17 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Investor & Pitch #42 / 66
Usable
#56 / 66
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Executive Assistant #31 / 112
Strong
#19 / 112
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Landing Pages #30 / 72
Strong
#40 / 72
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Translation & Localization #25 / 110
Excellent
#30 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Legal & HR #69 / 110
Strong
#73 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Data & Analytics #33 / 110
Excellent
#34 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher in 13 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 in 9.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs 1.7× less per token ($10.5 vs $18 per 1M).

What is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better at?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 out-ranks Gemini 3.5 Flash at Research & Competitive Analysis, Sales, Knowledge & Docs.

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash better at?

Gemini 3.5 Flash out-ranks Claude Sonnet 4.5 at Chef / Home Cooking, Structured Output, AI Strategy.

Full Claude Sonnet 4.5 review → Full Gemini 3.5 Flash review → Full model leaderboard → Anthropic vs Google — every model, lab against lab →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s