Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Google Gemini 3.5 Flash VS MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 12 of 22 task areas we tested; Kimi K2.7 Code takes 10. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 2.5× less per token ($4.24 vs $10.5 per 1M).

12
Task areas won
10
71
Avg percentile
73
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$10.5
Price / 1M tokens
$4.24
Google
Provider
MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.7 Code costs 2.5× less per token ($4.24 vs $10.5 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Gemini 3.5 Flash Kimi K2.7 Code Winner
Legal & HR #73 / 110
Strong
#14 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Frontend & Landing Pages #4 / 109
Usable
#54 / 109
Needs editing
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Research & Competitive Analysis #65 / 110
Usable
#20 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Investor & Pitch #56 / 66
Usable
#15 / 66
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
Chef / Home Cooking #24 / 126
Usable
#58 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Training & Education #7 / 110
Excellent
#39 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Summarization & Meeting Notes #17 / 110
Excellent
#47 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Knowledge & Docs #44 / 110
Strong
#16 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Landing Pages #40 / 72
Strong
#17 / 72
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
Product & Project Management #33 / 110
Strong
#10 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
AI Strategy #23 / 126
Strong
#44 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Translation & Localization #30 / 110
Excellent
#48 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Creative & Comedy #27 / 110 #44 / 110 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Sales #33 / 110
Strong
#48 / 110
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Coding #28 / 115
Strong
#41 / 115
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Executive Assistant #19 / 112
Strong
#6 / 112
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
Presentations & Decks #17 / 110
Excellent
#5 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Structured Output #35 / 113
Excellent
#46 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
RAG, Safety & Grounding #15 / 113
Excellent
#21 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Data & Analytics #34 / 110
Excellent
#31 / 110
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Content & Brand #46 / 124
Strong
#48 / 124
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Customer Support #12 / 113
Strong
#10 / 113
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher in 12 and Kimi K2.7 Code in 10.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code costs 2.5× less per token ($4.24 vs $10.5 per 1M).

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash better at?

Gemini 3.5 Flash out-ranks Kimi K2.7 Code at Frontend & Landing Pages, Chef / Home Cooking, Training & Education.

What is Kimi K2.7 Code better at?

Kimi K2.7 Code out-ranks Gemini 3.5 Flash at Legal & HR, Research & Competitive Analysis, Investor & Pitch.

Full Gemini 3.5 Flash review → Full Kimi K2.7 Code review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s